“Writing Expresses and Shares Meaning to be Reconstructed by the Reader”

Writing Expresses and Shares Meaning to be Reconstructed by the Reader- By Charles Bazerman

In the article the author explains the way that writing has meaning whether that is through communication, words, texts, phrases, anything that can get the reader’s attention in regard to the writings meaning.  The author explains that lots can be learned throughout reading an article and its writing. It creates new forms of communication, ways to interpret texts, new ideas being sparked everything that would display the writings meaning.

 

As a writer if a piece does not go the way that I want it to or intended for it to go I change it. How would I change it I would get feedback from others as to what needed to be changed, what needed to be added what didn’t they understand, what I can help them understand. I would ask all of those questions and then when I published a new article, I would make sure that it was just a little bit better if not a lot better than the last one. I would feel down about it, but it would in turn motivate me to move further with it and continue further into my writing. Nobody is going to think the exact same way as another person we all interpret text differently, as a writer I would generalize my topic into a version that can not only be understood but comprehended about the same as I intended. Like how Bazerman says ” While writers can confirm that the written words feel consistent with their state of mind, readers can never read the writers mind to confirm that they fully share that state of mind.” (Bazerman Pg 22)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on “Writing Expresses and Shares Meaning to be Reconstructed by the Reader”

Writing Expressed and Shares Meaning to be Constructed by the Reader

Charles Bazerman’s article, “Writing Expressed and Shares Meaning to Be Reconstructed by the Reader,” discusses the dynamic nature of writing, highlighting that it’s not a one-sided transmission but a collaborative process between writer and reader. He says that written text isn’t a fixed message but rather a shared space where readers actively engage, interpret, and reconstruct meaning based on their unique perspectives. This perspective challenges the notion of writing as a one-way communication, underlining its interactive nature. Bazerman emphasizes that effective communication through writing involves recognizing the reader’s role in shaping and interpreting the intended meaning, making it a collaborative endeavor rather than a passive reception of information.

In my own experience, I once sent a text message to a friend, thinking it conveyed my feelings clearly. However, my friend misunderstood my message, leading to confusion and a disagreement between us. This incident highlighted how readers bring their own perspectives to what they read, even in a simple text message. As a writer, it has taught me the importance of considering the reader’s viewpoint, being concise and clear in my communication, and being aware of potential misunderstandings to ensure effective written communication. Bazerman’s article remind us that writing is an interactive process, where readers actively participate in constructing meaning from the text.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Writing Expressed and Shares Meaning to be Constructed by the Reader

Writing Expresses and Shares Meaning to Be Reconstructed by the Reader

In Charles Bazerman’s article “Writing Expresses and Shares Meaning to Be Reconstructed by the Reader” he explains that using a medium of written words and sentences we can communicate a meaning. The meanings do not reside in the text but in the relation of the reader, text and writer. Meanings for a writer come from their thoughts. The meaning assigned by a reader come from experiences and objects that are accessible. A writer’s shared expressions can provoke anxiety about how a reader will interpret it.  A meaning is communicated to a reader through written words from the writer.

A personal experience I have with a writing that did not have the effect intended was a text to my biological dad. I had intended to send a text of what my dad had texted me to my mom to inform her of the plans for the weekend but I ended up sending the text to my dad. Sending it to him was not the major mistake; My mom and I call my dad ‘Light Switch’ to each other never in front or to him, in the text I stated “Light Switch said…” That text caused me to feel bad towards my dad for him knowing that I do not call him dad to my mom and others. I apologized profusely to him but he just made a joke out of it. I still feel bad about it at times but at least him and I can laugh about it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Writing Expresses and Shares Meaning to Be Reconstructed by the Reader

Writing Expresses and Shares Meaning to be Reconstructed by the Reader

In this article written by Charles Bazerman, he explains that by writing, we can communicate through a medium of written words. The expression of writing makes them clearer to the readers, where they can attempt to make sense of the words the writer has written. He also states that while writers can maintain a consistent state of mind, the readers cannot read the mind of the writer. Meanings do not reside fully in the words of the text, but in the minds of the reader and the writer. Meanings from writers arise from thought, while meanings from readers arise from objects, experiences, etc.. Children grasp that as they are writing they can learn to share their experiences. As their writing develops, their meanings grow a wider range of experiences, which in turn create a wider audience of readers. It can be troublesome for the reader because of the tension between expression and meaning. Readers view expressions as personal, and we are not sure how others will respond to that, creating anxiety and hesitation to share. Meaning is not transparently available, and as writers we need to work on words that share expressions of meaning.

A personal experience I have had with something I have wrote that did not have the intended effect was an essay I have wrote in High School. I intended to appeal to the audiences emotion, and it came off as more factual than personal. I was hesitant to come off more personal, because I was unsure how others would have reacted. I realized that I needed to change the tone and wording and get more personal to appeal to the audience I was writing for. Sometimes meanings are not just given to you as a reader, so you reconstruct ideas. It is important to work on sharing expressions and words that make it so the readers are getting what you intended them to get.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Writing Expresses and Shares Meaning to be Reconstructed by the Reader

Writing Expresses and Shares Meaning to Be Reconstructed by the Reader

The act of writing involves expressing thoughts, ideas, and information through words and sentences. However, the meaning conveyed in writing is not fixed ; it is meant to be reconstructed and interpreted by the reader. In this process, the writer’s words serve as a bridge, inviting the reader to engage, interpret, and reconstruct the intended meaning. Writing, in its essence, is a collaborative act between the writer and the reader. While the writer provides the framework and context, the reader brings their unique perspective, experiences, and understanding to the text. This interaction allows for a multifaceted and evolving interpretation of the written words. Readers may uncover layers of meaning, draw connections, and extract insights that the writer may not have explicitly stated. This interplay between writer and reader adds depth and complexity to the act of communication, making writing a dynamic and powerful means of sharing ideas and knowledge. Writing serves as a vehicle for expressing and sharing meaning, with the understanding that its true significance is realized through the active engagement and interpretation of the reader. This collaborative process enriches the written word and contributes to the many ways in which meaning is understood.

As a writer, I have encountered instances where something I wrote did not have the intended effect on the reader. One specific example that comes to mind involved an text I composed to provide constructive feedback to a colleague. My intention was to offer helpful suggestions for improvement in a supportive and encouraging manner. However, the recipient of the email interpreted my message as critical and confrontational, which was not my intent at all. When I learned about the unintended effect, I felt a mix of surprise, frustration, and disappointment. I had taken great care to choose my words thoughtfully, but I had failed to consider how the tone and structure of the email might be perceived differently by the reader. In response to this situation, I immediately reached out to the colleague and clarified my intentions, apologizing for any misunderstanding. I also took it as a valuable lesson in the importance of considering not just what I wanted to convey but also how the reader might interpret and reconstruct my message. It prompted me to become more conscious of the nuances of language, tone, and context in my writing, especially in situations where the potential for misinterpretation is high.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Writing Expresses and Shares Meaning to Be Reconstructed by the Reader

Writing is a Social and Rhetorical Activity

Kevin Roozen states in Writing is a Social and Rhetorical Activity that anytime you are writing something, you are drawing from previous readings, conversations or experiences.  For example, a description, saying or definition.  You can then gather that with the current information you have and apply it to the audience you intend to present it to.  He favors that there is always an audience, even if it is yourself.  He believes writing connects the writer and the reader.  In the end, he is trying to emphasize writing being both a rhetorical and social activity.

When I helped organize an event, I wrote the invitations.  I had to consider my audience (social aspect), and also the best way to convey the information (rhetorical aspect).  I chose words that would appeal to my friends and also clearly communicated the event details.  This shows that writing is both a social and rhetorical activity because it involves considering the audience and the most effective way to get the message across.  Understanding the social and rhetorical nature of writing is crucial because it helps you connect with your audience effectively.  It´s not just about what you say, but how you say it and who you’re saying it to.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Writing is a Social and Rhetorical Activity

“Writing Is a Social and Rhetorical Activity”

In Kevin Roozen’s, “Writing Is a Social and Rhetorical Activity,” he talks about the conscious and subconscious connections with a specific audience. Writers can reach specific audiences by connecting with other people who are either part of the audience, or have studied the desired audience. Though writers may seem alone, they are not. Writers have to connect to their audience, think like one one they are not, act like someone they are not.

This week I wrote a class plan for my fexability and conditioning class. I wrote the plan for myself as a guide to what I would be teaching. The plan may not provide a lot of information, but it is all I need to teach. I am connecting to others by using the plan to coach and talk to my students about different muscles and how to train specific muscles. Part of the lesson plan included, “Start the class by explaining the major muscles groups for the femoral region,” for someone that may have taught the class other then me this would be good to know, and a plan for the day would be nice to have. It is important that we can successfully write in a rhetorical nature so that people can understand what the writers have to say. 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on “Writing Is a Social and Rhetorical Activity”

Writing Is a Social and Rhetorical Activity

In Kevin Roozen’s, “Writing Is a Social and Rhetorical Activity”, he states that writers often forget that they are writing to a specific audience and there is always a connection between the writer and the reader. He believes that writing is simply catering to the audience’s needs. Simply put, writing connects everyone and everything, and understanding this concept makes for better writing.

Earlier today I wrote a journal in my Personal Finance class for my teacher. That writing demonstrated being a social activity because the journal was about your progress in the class and we work in groups. It demonstrated being a rhetorical activity because our teacher reads the journals and grades them. We do journals every week so it is also rhetorical in that our teacher has expectations of us. It is important to understand the social and rhetorical nature of writing because these qualities make for clearer and more communicative writing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Writing Is a Social and Rhetorical Activity

Writing is a social and rhetorical activity-blog post #2

In Kevin Roozen’s article, “Writing Is a Social and Rhetorical Activity”, he stands by the approach that writing is more than just words on a paper and that it actually connects people from everywhere whether we as writers recognize it or not. He advocates this because writing is always attempting to fit the needs of an audience even if that audience is simply just yourself. People do this by taking the ideas and inspirations of other people which spirals us back to the point that writing connects people more than it’s thought to.

This week in my psychology class, I wrote a research paper on topics that we were required to study. This paper required me to interview and discuss different ideas with five other people. This directly hits the point that writing is a social activity. In doing this requirement, I was meeting the standards of my audience, aka professor, based on what she wanted to hear. This not only made me engage with others by demand, but it also made me engage by choice as I had others proofread my writing to make sure it was as sound as possible for my said audience. In the text, Kevin Roozen says, “In working to accomplish their purposes and address an audience’s needs, writers draw upon many other people.” This quote demonstrates the point that for successful writing, it typically falls on being a heavy social and rhetorical activity.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Writing is a social and rhetorical activity-blog post #2

Writing is a social and rhetorical activity

 

  1. In the article ‘Writing is a social and rhetorical activity’, author Kevin Roozen explains how social writing is. He then mode explains how that whenever a writer is writing, they are aiming it toward a certain demographic. He also highlights how writing is as much a rhetorical activity as it is social, due to writers needing to use the right words and phrases when trying to persuade an audience

2. Last week I wrote a letter to my 13 year old self giving advice for an assignment In my writing class. This was a very social activity because when writing it, I had to direct as if im talking to a less mature, less experienced, and younger version of myself. This was difficult as I had to imagine it like I was writing a letter to a 13 year old. This is rhetorical too as I had to write it in a way where my younger self could comprehend and apply it to life.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Writing is a social and rhetorical activity