By: Aubrie McKee
In his thought-provoking article, “Writing Is Not Natural” Dylan B. Dryer navigates the intricate landscape of writing, presenting it not as a spontaneous extension of speech but as a meticulously developed technological craft. Unlike the inherent and universally understood nature of speech, writing emerges as a cultivated skill involving the translation of thoughts through intricate arrays and inscriptions. Its roots extend back to 3400 B.C., marking a relatively recent milestone in the tapestry of human history. Notably, this written form of communication is not universally familiar, as some languages lack a formal writing system, underscoring its diverse and dynamic evolution.
Ancient Egypt Greek Writing
The vast realm of writing unfolds as a spectrum of technologies, encompassing inscriptions, symbols, codes, and arrays, each serving as tangible evidence of human activity. Dryer sheds light on the common struggle faced by individuals in mastering writing, attributing it to the persistent comparison with speech. This continual parallel not only stifles emotional expression but also obstructs clarity in conveying thoughts and ideas. Instead of self-blame for the intricacies of language, Dryer suggests that authors should recognize the inherent misunderstandings woven into the fabric of communication’s complexity.
Writers, in response to these challenges, actively endeavor to surmount barriers by cultivating a form of muscle memory for symbols and enhancing the lucidity of their writing. Their aim is to attain a level of comprehension akin to the fluidity found in speech. This journey requires a sustained effort to bridge the gap between the spoken and written word, acknowledging the unique challenges posed by writing.
Viewing writing as a technological endeavor invites fresh perspectives on the nuances entwined with mastering this skill. It prompts an appreciation for the diverse technologies, such as symbols and code, that writers employ to transmute their thoughts into written form. Dryer’s exploration encourages a shift in mindset, urging individuals to perceive writing not as an inherent ability but as a craft to be learned and refined over time.
A person writing on a brown wooden table near a white ceramic mug
In conclusion, Dryer’s article prompts a reconsideration of the nature of writing, emphasizing its technological dimensions and distinctiveness from speech. By recognizing the challenges inherent in writing and appreciating it as a skill to be cultivated, individuals can approach the task with a greater understanding of its complexities.
