In Doug Down´s article ¨Revision is Central to Developing Writing,¨ the main idea is that effective writing is achieved through a process of iterative revision. Writers should create multiple versions of their work, allowing for reflection, feedback, and significant development of ideas, structures, and design. This kind of revision goes beyond basic editing. Downs argues that unrevised writing is unlikely to fulfill its purpose, and writers who avoid revision are less likely to achieve positive results. Revision is compared to driving with headlights, where each draft illuminates new insights, and it is emphasized that it´s a crucial component of skilled, professional writing. The article shows the importance of making revision an expected part of the writing process, not a punishment.
Both Doug Downs´ ¨Revision is Central to Developing Writing¨ and Anne Lamott´s ¨Shitty First Drafts¨ emphasize the importance of multiple drafts in the writing process. Both acknowledge that first drafts are typically imperfect and need substantial revision to improve. They share the idea that writing is a process that evolves through stages. However, they differ in their primary focus. Lamott´s essay is more about embracing the messy, imperfect nature of first drafts. She encourages writers to let go of perfectionism and accept the messiness of early writing. In contrast, Downs´ essay is primarily about the crucial role of revision in developing writing, highlighting the need for deliberate and significant changes to ideas, structure, and design to create the best possible work. Comparing the two articles highlights that while the initial writing stage might be messy, its the subsequent revisions that make the writing to its full potential.
