In the article written by Doug Downs, Revision is Central to Developing Writing, he talks about how writers work in composing several different versions. Each time reflecting or getting reader feedback. Revision significantly develops the text’s ideas, structure, and design. Writing is not often right the first time. Writers who do not revise see fewer positive results, than those who make time for feedback and revision. Revision shares a characteristic of language-based endeavors. Writing gives the writer something new to talk about that they have not said before. Revision also works by building the textual-production time giving space for more consideration for gaining additional perspectives. Revision is central to developing writing. Some may see revision as punishment or poor performance. Revising is not an indicator of poor writing, but a sign and function of skill, maturity, and professional writing.
The articles Revision is Central to Developing Writing and Shitty First Drafts are similar because they both talk about how everyone needs revisions to obtain the terrific final drafts that we all hope for the first time. Both articles talk about how no one can achieve a final piece of writing without revisions and feel confident about their writing. These two articles are different because Shitty First Drafts goes into specific detail about a personal experience, while Revision is Central to Developing Writing is more of a general piece. Overall, I learned by comparing the two articles that it is extremely important to make time for revisions and not to feel put down when receiving feedback. The feedback is only to help you grow as a writers and achieve the best writing that you can.
